AFRI Annual Review Funding Portfolio
Fiscal year 2016
The Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI) is NIFA’s flagship competitive grants program. The purpose of AFRI is to support research, education, and extension work that address key problems of national and regional importance in sustaining all components of food and agriculture. AFRI is authorized under the 2014 Farm Bill and supports work in six priority areas: 1) plant health and production and plant products; 2) animal health and production and animal products; 3) food safety, nutrition and health; 4) bioenergy, natural resources and environment; 5) agriculture systems and technology; and 6) agriculture economics and rural communities.
In FY 2016, AFRI received $350,000,000 to administer and support basic and applied research, education, and extension programs (Table 1). These programs expanded our existing investments and created new opportunities to address the food and agricultural sciences. Due to the type of funds AFRI receives, the program can continue to expend funds until they are all applied to scientific projects; therefore, all funds may not be obligated in one year. However, AFRI has a scientifically-based annual approach to the expenditures of all funds to support the challenges of food and agriculture.
Over the past five years (Figure 1), AFRI has received $1,531,447,906 to advance research, education, and extension activities. This level of investment shows a gradual upward trend in funding, representing approximately a 32 percent increase in funding from $264,470,000 in 2012 to $350,000,000 in 2016.
NIFA works continuously to ensure the public understands the relationship between the AFRI portfolio and the six Farm Bill priorities. While it is easy to see the relationship within the Foundational programs, the Challenge Areas and Fellowships programs aren’t as obvious. Therefore, a breakout of the expended funds (Figure 2) to date shows the multiple disciplinary work of the entire AFRI program.
AFRI offers Food and Agricultural Science Enhancement (FASE) grants (Table 5) to enhance institutional capacity and attract new scientists into careers of high-priority areas of national need in agriculture, food, and environmental sciences. FASE grants provide support for postdoctoral fellowships; new investigators; and project directors at small, mid-sized, or minority-serving institutions with limited institutional success or at degree-granting institutions and state agricultural experiment stations in states where institutions have been less successful in receiving AFRI funding (NIFA identifies these states as Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research states). In FY 2016, approximately 15 percent of AFRI funds were set-aside to support FASE grants.
OVERVIEW OF THE APPLICATION PROCESS
FY 2016 was the eighth year that AFRI solicited competitive grant applications; 45 programs solicited applications address the six AFRI priority areas and 6 challenge areas. A total of 2,719 competitive grant applications, requesting $1,847,959,564, were received and reviewed through a competitive peer review process (Table 2). Awards totaling $307,146,459 were made to the 664 highest-ranked applications distributed across the program (Table 3). An additional 757 proposals were recommended - rated as Outstanding, High Priority, and/or Medium Priority - for funding by review panels and could have been supported, provided an additional $682,014,317 was available to the program.
The success rate for AFRI applications in FY 2016, calculated in terms of number of proposals funded (excluding conferences, supplements, continuing increments of the same grant, and NIFA Fellowships) divided by the number of proposals submitted for review, was 20 percent.
AFRI awards are made in the form of single-function research; single-function education; single-function extension; and integrated research, education, and/or extension grants (Table 4). The mean award size for research projects was $602,139 for up to five years, excluding FASE grants and Conference grants. These excluded grant types are often shorter in duration and have lower budget limitations than standard research awards. The average award for integrated projects was $628,562 for up to five years, excluding FASE grants and Conference grants. AFRI provided funds totaling $1,080,112 in support of 36 Conference grants. These conferences brought scientists together to identify research, education, and extension priorities; provide an update on research information; and/or advance an area of science important to U.S. agriculture, food, forestry, the environment, and rural communities. Fifty-two percent of AFRI awards support fundamental research to deliver basic knowledge to advance applied research and conceptual breakthroughs in fields relevant to agriculture. Mission-oriented awards accounted for the remaining 48 percent to fund applied work to address specific problems, needs, or opportunities. Multidisciplinary awards encourage collaborations between institutions, agencies, and fields of study to solve complex problems and seek to initiate research in new areas of science and engineering that are relevant to agriculture, food, forestry, the environment, and rural communities. Multidisciplinary teams conducted 75 percent of the AFRI awards made in 2016.
INSTITUTION TYPE DEMOGRAPHICS
AFRI engages a broad range of entities including land-grant universities (1862, 1890, and 1994), public non-land-grant universities, private colleges and universities, private research foundations, federal institutions, individuals, and industry. A breakdown of submitted applications, funded applications, and FY 2016 dollars awarded is available by institution type (Table 7).
STUDENT SUPPORT BY PROGRAM AREA
Competitive grants administered by AFRI provide jobs to train the next generation of agricultural professionals. In 2016, AFRI provided funding for more than 1,889 students and post-doctorates for more than 1,960 years, cumulatively (Table 8).
CROSSCUTTING SCIENTIFIC AREA
AFRI makes awards that span several topics of major importance to USDA. Table 6 includes the crosscutting areas, number of awards, and total amount of funding for each area.